Holland had a very nice game.
You have yet to even state what these magical adjustments were. You don't have a point. Instead of hanging a 3-point loss on your punching bag for not getting one more first down, why aren't we talking about the defense giving up two 80-yard drives with 8 minutes to play? Like I said, specious.
It has nothing to do with popularity. It's simply wrong.
It's OK to think Tommy Stevens is good. It's also ok to be grounded in reality and understand that you don't know more than the coaching staff.
Pointing to an adjustment the USC defense made in a game in which they gave up 49 points is...specious.
[hand wave emoji]
I guess it's good we're debating things that aren't real. It means we're a very talented team.
OH HO HO!
What can I say? I just friggin love tuddies.
This may be the finest article ever written on this web platform.
15 or 16 deep on the DL is every scholarship player, so I don't think that's right. DT has 5 guys with significant PT, so that should be OK. CB has 3 and Wade and Zech pushing. DE has 6 guys, 3 with zero PT. Certainly there's an expectation factor with Simmons/Toney/George, but they're all freshmen. I also wouldn't use the term extensive for LB depth. You have 3 guys total that have shown consistency and then a whole bunch of question marks. Safety has 1 proven guy in the 3-deep. I'll be happy with a top 40-50 defense all things considered.
I dunno. We definitely don't have the depth of OSU on D.
Holy cow, that's so terrible of me. Meant to write largest city. Thanks!
Here's hoping JoMo stays for 4 years.